Font Converter

Brand Font Generator

Two corporate wordmarks people look up constantly, and what each one was really drawn from. This page is about fonts that resemble these logos, not the logos themselves. Nothing here is official, licensed or authorised, and no file that reproduces either mark is offered.

9/500 characters. Every style below updates as you type.

Pick a look

Connected, sloping, high-flourish. Unicode script letters do not join, which is the whole limitation.

Script

Mathematical script

Reverts to plain text if the field normalises what you save

Bold Script

Mathematical bold script

Reverts to plain text if the field normalises what you save

Italic

Mathematical italic

Reverts to plain text if the field normalises what you save

Small Caps

Unicode small capitals

Survives normalisation, stays styled once saved

Developer & Verifier

Marcus Rodriguez

Developed by

Marcus Rodriguez

Full-stack developer specializing in web font implementation and performance optimization

Sarah Mitchell

Verified by

Sarah Mitchell

Typography expert specializing in font design, web typography, and accessibility

Two wordmarks, two completely different answers

One of these was drawn by hand a hundred and forty years ago in a style nobody writes any more. The other was typeset from a family you can still buy, then modified. Knowing which is which is most of what makes the question answerable.

The Coca-Cola script

The Coca-Cola logo was drawn in 1886 by Frank Mason Robinson, who was John Pemberton's bookkeeper and who also proposed the name. He wrote it in Spencerian script, which was not a typeface but a handwriting system: developed by Platt Rogers Spencer in the mid-1800s and taught in American schools as the standard hand for business correspondence for roughly seventy-five years. Robinson was writing the company's name the way he wrote everything else, and the mark has survived largely unaltered since, with the red disc and the ribbon added around it much later.

So there is no Coca-Cola font, in the ordinary sense that there is no alphabet behind it, only one word written once. The style behind it, on the other hand, is a documented penmanship tradition that many foundries have interpreted, and Spencerian or copperplate script is the term to search for if you want that texture legally. Our calligraphy page is the closest thing on this site, with real files and their licences attached.

The Unicode script styles above are a different thing again, and it is worth being clear about the gap. They come from the Mathematical Alphanumeric Symbols block, they were added for notation rather than for decoration, and the letters do not join to each other. A joined script is exactly what Spencerian is, so these will read as ornamental but never as handwriting.

  • ๐’ดโ„ด๐“Š๐“‡ ๐’ฉ๐’ถ๐“‚โ„ฏScript
  • ๐“จ๐“ธ๐“พ๐“ป ๐“๐“ช๐“ถ๐“ฎBold Script
  • ๐‘Œ๐‘œ๐‘ข๐‘Ÿ ๐‘๐‘Ž๐‘š๐‘’Italic
  • สแดแดœส€ ษดแด€แดแด‡Small Caps

The Nike wordmark

Nike is two marks that people tend to run together. The Swoosh was drawn in 1971 by Carolyn Davidson, then a graphic design student, for a fee widely reported as thirty-five dollars, and trademarked that June. She was given company stock years later. The Swoosh is a drawing and has never had anything to do with type.

The NIKE wordmark that sat inside the Swoosh for roughly the brand's first two decades is the part with a typographic answer: all capitals, in a modified Futura Bold Condensed. Futura is Paul Renner's 1927 geometric sans, one of the most widely licensed families in existence, so the base alphabet is easy to get from any major foundry. What you cannot get is the specific modification, and you should not try to reproduce the lockup itself, which is the registered mark rather than the typeface.

Files circulating as a Nike font are traced from the wordmark and are not offered here. If what you want is the sports lettering register rather than this one brand, the jersey page and the varsity page are the right places, and both have downloadable faces.

  • ๐˜๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐๐š๐ฆ๐žBold
  • ๐—ฌ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—ก๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฒSans Bold
  • สแดแดœส€ ษดแด€แดแด‡Small Caps
  • ๐‘Œ๐‘œ๐‘ข๐‘Ÿ ๐‘๐‘Ž๐‘š๐‘’Italic

What this page is, and what it is not

Font-Converters has no relationship with The Coca-Cola Company or with Nike, Inc. This page is not endorsed by either of them, it is not an official resource, and it does not grant or imply any permission. Both wordmarks are registered trademarks belonging to their owners. Describing how a logo was made is not the same as distributing it, and this brand font generator only does the first.

That is also why there is no download shelf on this page, which is unusual for the site. Files that reproduce a live corporate wordmark are easy to find elsewhere and every one of them exists for a single purpose. Linking to one would be recommending a tool for passing off somebody else's mark, and no amount of traffic makes that a reasonable thing for a font site to do.

The useful version of the question is almost always one step back from the brand. Behind Coca-Cola is Spencerian penmanship, a documented style with many legitimate interpretations. Behind the Nike wordmark is Futura, a family you can license in an afternoon. Neither answer gives you the logo, and both give you the look that made the logo work.

Where a lookalike stops being safe

This is not legal advice, and if there is money involved you want a lawyer rather than a font site. What can be said generally is that typefaces and trademarks are separate things under separate rules. Setting your own words in Futura is ordinary use of a licensed typeface. Setting the word Nike in Futura Bold Condensed and putting a swoosh next to it is reproducing a mark, and the typeface licence has no bearing on that at all.

The same line runs through the script side. A copperplate or Spencerian face used for a wedding invitation is a font doing its job. The same face bent into the Coca-Cola lockup on a product label is a different act entirely. The variable that matters is whether a reader would take your thing for theirs, not which file you opened.

Browse the individual generators

The styles above cover the looks people ask for by mood. When you already know the typographic name for what you want, these pages go deeper on one style each.

The full directory is at all font generators.

Other categories

Frequently asked questions

What font is the Coca-Cola logo?
None, strictly. It is hand lettering drawn in 1886 by Frank Mason Robinson, Pembertonโ€™s bookkeeper, in Spencerian script. Spencerian was a handwriting system developed by Platt Rogers Spencer and taught as the standard American business hand for around seventy-five years, not a typeface. The closest legitimate search term is Spencerian or copperplate script, which many foundries have interpreted.
What font does Nike use?
The NIKE wordmark used alongside the Swoosh for roughly the brandโ€™s first two decades is all capitals in a modified Futura Bold Condensed. Futura is Paul Rennerโ€™s 1927 geometric sans and is licensed by every major distributor, so the underlying family is easy to obtain. The Swoosh itself is a 1971 drawing by Carolyn Davidson and has no typographic component.
Can I download the Coca-Cola or Nike font from this page?
No. Both are registered trademarks and files that reproduce them exist only to let somebody pass off a mark that is not theirs. This page names what the lettering was built from instead, which is more useful and does not put you in a difficult position. For the Coca-Cola texture, look for Spencerian and copperplate scripts. For the Nike wordmark, license Futura.
Is Font-Converters affiliated with these brands?
No. Font-Converters is not affiliated with, endorsed by or authorised by The Coca-Cola Company or Nike, Inc. All trademarks named on this page belong to their respective owners and are referred to only to describe how their lettering was made.
Is it legal to use a lookalike font for a logo?
This is not legal advice. In general, typefaces and trademarks are governed separately: using a licensed typeface for your own words is ordinary use, while arranging that typeface into somebody elseโ€™s registered wordmark is reproducing a mark regardless of the font licence. The question that matters is whether a reader would mistake your work for theirs. If money is involved, ask a lawyer rather than a font site.
Advertisement