Font Converter

Web Open Font Format (WOFF) 1.0

Original web font wrapper for TrueType and OpenType fonts

TL;DR

In Simple Terms

WOFF (Web Open Font Format) is a compressed web font format with 99%+ browser support including IE9+. Uses zlib compression (40% smaller than TTF).WOFF2 is the newer, better choice (30% smaller than WOFF). Use WOFF as fallback for browsers that don't support WOFF2 (pre-2014 browsers).For modern sites: Serve WOFF2 first, WOFF fallback. Format order in @font-face matters—list WOFF2 before WOFF.

Share this page to:

WOFF Format at a Glance

Developer

W3C WebFonts Working Group (2009-2012)

File Extension

.woff

MIME Type

font/woff, application/font-woff

Type

Compressed web wrapper for sfnt fonts (TTF/OTF)

Platform Support

All modern browsers; legacy support fallback

Primary Use

Fallback web fonts for older browser compatibility

Convert WOFF to:

Choose your target format below

All conversions preserve font quality and metadata

What is Web Open Font Format (WOFF)?

Web Open Font Format (WOFF) is a compressed font container format developed specifically for web use. WOFF wraps existing TrueType or OpenType fonts in a standardized package optimized for web delivery, providing better compression than raw font files while preserving all original typographic capabilities.

Core Characteristics

WOFF is fundamentally a transport format rather than a new font technology:

  • Container format: Wraps TTF or OTF fonts without modifying glyph data
  • zlib compression: Compresses each font table individually for reduced file size
  • Metadata support: Optional XML metadata for licensing and attribution
  • Web-optimized: Designed specifically for @font-face delivery
  • Browser decompression: Automatically inflated to TTF/OTF in memory

How WOFF Works

When a browser encounters a WOFF font, it performs the following steps:

  1. Downloads the compressed .woff file
  2. Validates the WOFF header and table directory
  3. Decompresses each font table using zlib
  4. Reconstructs the original sfnt font structure in memory
  5. Uses the font exactly as if it were the original TTF/OTF

This means WOFF fonts have identical rendering, hinting, and OpenType feature support to their source fonts—the only difference is the compressed delivery mechanism.

Current Status

While WOFF achieved universal browser support and transformed web typography from 2010-2016, it has been largely superseded by WOFF2, which offers significantly better compression through Brotli encoding. Today, WOFF serves primarily as a fallback format for older browsers, with WOFF2 as the primary web font format.

Modern Usage

For new web projects in 2025, use WOFF2 as your primary format and include WOFF only if you need to support Internet Explorer 11 or very old mobile browsers. WOFF2 provides 30% better compression and is supported by all modern browsers.

Format History

The Web Open Font Format (WOFF) emerged from years of frustration with web typography limitations and represents a crucial stepping stone in the evolution of fonts on the web. Its story is one of industry collaboration, technical compromise, and the recognition that the web needed its own font delivery mechanism.

The Dark Ages of Web Typography (1996-2008)

For over a decade, web designers faced severe typography constraints that limited creative expression and brand consistency:

The "Web Safe Fonts" Problem

  • Limited choices: Only ~12 fonts available across Windows and Mac (Arial, Times New Roman, Georgia, Verdana, etc.)
  • No brand fonts: Companies couldn't use their corporate typefaces online
  • Design constraints: Typography was reduced to font stacks and fallback lists
  • Platform differences: Fonts rendered differently across operating systems
  • Creative workarounds: Designers resorted to image replacement, Flash, or sIFR hacks

The CSS2 specification (1998) included @font-face, but without a standardized font format for the web, browsers implemented it inconsistently or not at all. The result was a fractured landscape where custom fonts were effectively impossible.

Early Web Font Attempts (1996-2008)

Several attempts to solve web typography preceded WOFF:

TechnologyYearApproachWhy It Failed
TrueDoc1996Bitstream's portable font formatLimited browser support, proprietary
EOT1997Microsoft's embedded OpenTypeIE-only, complex DRM, vendor lock-in
Raw TTF/OTF2006Safari allows desktop fontsFont piracy concerns, no optimization
SVG Fonts2001XML-based vector fontsPoor performance, large files, limited adoption
sIFR/Cufón2004-2008Flash or Canvas font replacementSlow, not selectable text, accessibility issues

Each solution had fatal flaws: proprietary formats created vendor lock-in, raw font files raised piracy concerns, and workarounds like Flash text were slow and inaccessible. The industry needed a standard that balanced font foundry concerns with developer needs.

The @font-face Renaissance (2008-2009)

In 2008, Safari 3.1 began supporting @font-face with raw TrueType and OpenType fonts, followed by Firefox 3.5 in 2009. This watershed moment proved that web fonts were technically feasible, but several problems remained:

Technical Issues

  • Large file sizes (no compression)
  • Slow download times on 2000s broadband
  • No metadata or licensing info in font files
  • Desktop fonts not optimized for web delivery
  • CORS and same-origin policy complications

Business Issues

  • Font foundries feared widespread piracy
  • Licensing unclear for web use
  • No way to restrict fonts to specific domains
  • Desktop font sales potentially cannibalized
  • Need for new licensing models

WOFF Development Begins (2009)

In April 2009, Mozilla's Jonathan Kew, Type Supply's Tal Leming, and FontFont's Erik van Blokland began developing WOFF as a pragmatic solution to web font delivery:

WOFF Design Goals

  • Compression: Reduce file sizes for faster delivery
  • Metadata: Embed licensing, vendor, and copyright information
  • Universal compatibility: Work across all browsers and platforms
  • Preserves font data: No modification to original TrueType/OpenType tables
  • Clear web-only usage: Signal to users that fonts are for web, not desktop installation
  • Simple transformation: Easy conversion from existing TTF/OTF fonts

WOFF was explicitly designed as a "container" rather than a new font format. It wraps existing TTF or OTF fonts in a compressed envelope with metadata, making it clear these are web resources while preserving all the original font's typographic capabilities.

W3C Standardization (2009-2012)

The WOFF specification was submitted to the W3C WebFonts Working Group for standardization:

DateMilestoneSignificance
April 2009WOFF proposal submittedInitial specification drafted
July 2010First Working Draft publishedPublic review begins
August 2010Firefox 3.6 ships WOFF supportFirst major browser implementation
December 2010Chrome 6.0 adds WOFF supportWebKit adoption accelerates
March 2011IE9 includes WOFF supportMicrosoft joins web fonts standard
December 2012WOFF 1.0 becomes W3C RecommendationOfficial standard status achieved

Browser Adoption and Market Impact (2010-2013)

WOFF's universal browser support created an explosion in web typography:

  • Google Fonts (2010): Launched with WOFF as primary format, democratizing web fonts
  • Typekit (acquired 2011): Web font service boom, Adobe acquires for $30M+
  • Font foundries adapt: Major type foundries create web font licensing programs
  • Design Renaissance: Websites finally achieve typographic parity with print
  • @font-face ubiquitous: CSS font loading becomes standard practice

WOFF Browser Support Timeline

BrowserVersionRelease DateImpact
Firefox3.6Aug 2010First implementation
Chrome6.0Dec 2010WebKit adoption
Internet Explorer9.0Mar 2011Microsoft endorsement
Safari5.1Jul 2011iOS support follows
Opera11.10Apr 2011Complete coverage

By 2013, WOFF support was effectively universal across modern browsers, achieving what no previous web font format had managed: cross-browser, cross-platform consistency without proprietary extensions.

Performance Limitations and WOFF2 Development (2013-2014)

Even as WOFF succeeded, performance concerns emerged:

WOFF Compression Limitations

  • zlib compression: Good but not optimal for font data
  • Per-table compression: Missed cross-table compression opportunities
  • Mobile performance: File sizes still significant on cellular networks
  • No preprocessing: TrueType tables stored as-is, not optimized
  • Typical reduction: ~40% smaller than raw TTF/OTF (good but not great)

Google's analysis of web font performance in 2013 showed that better compression could significantly improve page load times. This led to the development of WOFF2, which uses Brotli compression and preprocessing to achieve 30% better compression than WOFF.

WOFF2 Transition and WOFF's Decline (2014-Present)

WOFF2's superior compression and efficiency gradually displaced WOFF as the primary web font format:

PeriodWOFF StatusIndustry Trend
2010-2014DominantPrimary web font format
2014-2016MatureWOFF2 begins adoption
2016-2019FallbackWOFF2 becomes primary, WOFF secondary
2020-PresentLegacy SupportOnly for old browser compatibility

Current Status and Best Practices (2025)

WOFF remains supported but is no longer recommended for modern development:

When to Use WOFF

  • Supporting IE11 (end-of-life 2022)
  • Legacy browser requirements
  • As fallback with WOFF2 primary
  • Existing infrastructure dependencies

When to Use WOFF2

  • All new web projects (2025)
  • Performance-critical applications
  • Mobile-first design
  • Modern browser targets only

Modern @font-face Pattern

@font-face {
  font-family: 'WebFont';
  /* WOFF2 for modern browsers (90%+ compatibility) */
  src: url('font.woff2') format('woff2'),
       /* WOFF as fallback (legacy support) */
       url('font.woff') format('woff');
  font-display: swap; /* Improve perceived performance */
}

WOFF's Legacy and Lessons

WOFF's contribution to web typography cannot be overstated:

Technical Achievements

  • Solved cross-browser font delivery
  • Balanced compression with simplicity
  • Metadata framework for licensing
  • Foundation for WOFF2 improvements
  • Clear separation of web vs. desktop fonts

Cultural Impact

  • Ended the "web safe fonts" era
  • Enabled web font services ecosystem
  • Convinced foundries to embrace web licensing
  • Democratized professional typography
  • Improved web design quality universally

Historical Perspective

WOFF succeeded where TrueDoc, EOT, and SVG fonts failed because it solved a real problem without creating new ones. By wrapping existing fonts rather than inventing a new format, WOFF gained rapid adoption. By standardizing through W3C rather than remaining proprietary, it achieved universal browser support. And by providing just enough compression to matter without overcomplicating the specification, it delivered immediate value while leaving room for future improvement. WOFF2 eventually superseded it, but WOFF's design philosophy—pragmatic, open, and focused—remains the blueprint for successful web standards.

While WOFF may now serve primarily as a fallback format, its role in transforming web typography from a creative desert into a rich design medium cannot be overstated. Every beautiful typeface you see on the modern web stands on WOFF's shoulders.

Technical Specifications

Compression Method

WOFF employs zlib (DEFLATE) compression on a per-table basis:

  • zlib/DEFLATE algorithm: Standard compression used in ZIP files and PNG images
  • Per-table compression: Each OpenType table compressed independently
  • Typical compression ratio: 40-50% reduction from original TTF/OTF size
  • Decompression speed: Fast enough for real-time browser use

File Structure

ComponentSizeDescription
WOFF Header44 bytesSignature, flavor, length, numTables, reserved, totalSfntSize
Table Directory20 bytes per tableTag, offset, compLength, origLength, origChecksum
Font TablesVariableCompressed sfnt tables (glyf, cmap, head, etc.)
Extended MetadataOptionalXML metadata for licensing and attribution
Private DataOptionalVendor-specific data

WOFF Header Details

Header Structure

FieldTypeValue
signatureUInt320x774F4646 ("wOFF")
flavorUInt320x00010000 (TrueType) or "OTTO" (CFF)
lengthUInt32Total WOFF file size
numTablesUInt16Number of font tables

Metadata Block

WOFF supports optional XML metadata for licensing and attribution:

Metadata Example

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<metadata version="1.0">
  <uniqueid id="com.example.fontvendor.myfont.v1.2.3"/>
  <vendor name="Font Vendor" url="https://example.com"/>
  <credits>
    <credit name="Designer Name" role="Designer"/>
  </credits>
  <description>
    <text lang="en">A beautiful web font</text>
  </description>
  <license url="https://example.com/license">
    <text lang="en">Licensed for web use only</text>
  </license>
</metadata>

WOFF File Structure

Container Architecture

WOFF acts as a compressed container for sfnt-based fonts (TrueType and OpenType):

Processing Flow

  1. Creation: Original TTF/OTF font tables extracted
  2. Compression: Each table compressed individually with zlib
  3. Packaging: WOFF header and directory created
  4. Distribution: Smaller .woff file served via @font-face
  5. Browser loading: Browser downloads and validates WOFF header
  6. Decompression: Tables decompressed back to original sfnt format
  7. Rendering: Font used exactly as original TTF/OTF would be

Preserved Font Tables

All original OpenType tables are preserved without modification:

  • Required tables: cmap, glyf/CFF, head, hhea, hmtx, loca (TrueType), maxp, name, post
  • Optional tables: GSUB, GPOS, kern, gasp, GDEF, etc.
  • OpenType features: All ligatures, alternates, and layout features intact
  • Hinting: TrueType hinting instructions preserved
  • Kerning: Both kern table and GPOS kerning maintained

Key Principle

WOFF is transport, not transformation. The browser inflates WOFF back into the exact original font in memory. All layout logic, OpenType features, and rendering behavior come from the source font, not from WOFF itself.

Typography Features and Capabilities

WOFF does not add or remove typographic features—it simply delivers the source font's capabilities to the browser. Whatever OpenType features exist in the original TTF or OTF font remain available.

OpenType Feature Support

If the source font includes OpenType features, they can be activated via CSS:

CSS OpenType Features Example

@font-face {
  font-family: 'MyWebFont';
  src: url('/fonts/MyWebFont.woff2') format('woff2'),
       url('/fonts/MyWebFont.woff') format('woff');
  font-weight: 400;
  font-style: normal;
  font-display: swap;
}

/* Enable ligatures */
.text-with-ligatures {
  font-family: 'MyWebFont', sans-serif;
  font-feature-settings: 'liga' 1, 'dlig' 1;
}

/* Use old-style figures */
.text-with-oldstyle {
  font-variant-numeric: oldstyle-nums;
  /* Equivalent to: font-feature-settings: 'onum' 1; */
}

/* Small caps */
.small-caps {
  font-variant-caps: small-caps;
  /* Equivalent to: font-feature-settings: 'smcp' 1; */
}

/* Contextual alternates */
.fancy-text {
  font-feature-settings: 'calt' 1, 'salt' 1;
}

Variable Fonts in WOFF

WOFF can contain variable fonts with all their interpolation axes:

Variable Font Example

@font-face {
  font-family: 'MyVariableFont';
  src: url('font-variable.woff2') format('woff2'),
       url('font-variable.woff') format('woff');
  font-weight: 100 900; /* Weight range */
  font-stretch: 75% 125%; /* Width range */
}

h1 {
  font-family: 'MyVariableFont';
  font-weight: 750;
  font-variation-settings: 'wdth' 110, 'wght' 650;
}

Usage and Applications

Historical Usage (2010-2016)

During its peak, WOFF was the primary web font format:

  • Self-hosted web fonts: Primary format for font hosting
  • Web font services: Google Fonts, Typekit, Font Squirrel served WOFF
  • Responsive web design: Enabled custom typography in fluid layouts
  • Corporate branding: Companies could finally use brand fonts online
  • Icon fonts: Font Awesome and similar icon fonts distributed as WOFF

Current Usage (2025)

WOFF now serves primarily as a compatibility fallback:

  • Legacy browser support: Fallback for IE11 and older mobile browsers
  • Graceful degradation: Secondary format after WOFF2
  • Legacy infrastructure: Older webfont kits and CDNs
  • Compatibility layers: Ensuring fonts work on maximum browsers

When to Use WOFF vs WOFF2

ScenarioFormat ChoiceReason
New project (2025)WOFF2 primary, WOFF fallbackWOFF2 smaller, faster, universally supported
Modern browsers onlyWOFF2 only97%+ browser support, best performance
IE11 support requiredBoth WOFF2 and WOFFIE11 needs WOFF fallback
Legacy maintenanceKeep existing WOFFDon't break what works

Advantages and Disadvantages

Advantages

  • Universal browser support: Works in every browser since 2011
  • Good compression: 40-50% smaller than raw TTF/OTF
  • Preserves font quality: No loss of glyphs or OpenType features
  • Metadata support: Can embed licensing and attribution info
  • Simple conversion: Easy to create from existing fonts
  • Fast decompression: zlib decompresses quickly in browsers
  • Well-documented: W3C standard with clear specification

Disadvantages

  • Inferior to WOFF2: 30% larger files than WOFF2
  • Slower download: Larger file sizes impact page load
  • Not installable: Web-only, cannot be used as desktop font
  • Per-table compression: Misses global optimization opportunities
  • No preprocessing: Doesn't optimize TrueType tables like WOFF2
  • Legacy format: Primarily maintained for backward compatibility
  • Conversion overhead: Requires build step from source fonts

Performance Impact

On mobile devices with limited bandwidth, the 30% size difference between WOFF and WOFF2 is significant. A 100KB WOFF file becomes 70KB in WOFF2, saving 30KB—which can mean 150-300ms faster download on 3G connections. Multiply this across multiple font weights and you save seconds of load time.

WOFF vs Other Font Formats

Understanding WOFF's position relative to other web font formats:

FormatCompressionFile SizeBrowser SupportUse Case
WOFFzlibMediumUniversal (2011+)Legacy fallback
WOFF2BrotliSmallModern (97%+)Primary web font
TTFNoneLargeUniversalDesktop, source font
OTFCFF (optional)Medium-LargeUniversalDesktop, source font
EOTLZWMediumIE onlyObsolete (IE6-8)

File Size Comparison

Real-world compression comparison using Roboto Regular:

Roboto Regular File Sizes

FormatFile Sizevs TTFvs WOFF
TTF168 KB
WOFF89 KB-47%
WOFF268 KB-60%-24%

For detailed comparisons, see our WOFF vs WOFF2 comparison or WOFF vs TTF comparison.

Working with WOFF Files

Creating WOFF Files

Convert TTF or OTF source fonts to WOFF using various tools:

Command-Line Conversion

# Using sfnt2woff
sfnt2woff MyFont.ttf

# Using fonttools (Python)
pyftsubset MyFont.ttf --output-file=MyFont.woff --flavor=woff

# Using woff2 tools (convert to WOFF2, then WOFF if needed)
woff2_compress MyFont.ttf
woff2_decompress MyFont.woff2 MyFont-temp.ttf
sfnt2woff MyFont-temp.ttf

# Batch conversion
for font in *.ttf; do
  sfnt2woff "$font"
done

Using WOFF in CSS

Modern @font-face Pattern

/* Optimal font loading strategy */
@font-face {
  font-family: 'CustomFont';
  /* WOFF2 for 97%+ of users (modern browsers) */
  src: url('/fonts/CustomFont.woff2') format('woff2'),
       /* WOFF fallback for IE11 and old mobile */
       url('/fonts/CustomFont.woff') format('woff');
  font-weight: 400;
  font-style: normal;
  font-display: swap; /* Show fallback text immediately */
}

/* Multiple weights example */
@font-face {
  font-family: 'CustomFont';
  src: url('/fonts/CustomFont-Bold.woff2') format('woff2'),
       url('/fonts/CustomFont-Bold.woff') format('woff');
  font-weight: 700;
  font-style: normal;
  font-display: swap;
}

body {
  font-family: 'CustomFont', -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 
               'Segoe UI', system-ui, sans-serif;
}

Font Loading Optimization

Improve perceived performance with proper font loading strategies:

Preload Critical Fonts

<!-- In HTML <head> -->
<link rel="preload" 
      href="/fonts/CustomFont.woff2" 
      as="font" 
      type="font/woff2" 
      crossorigin>

<link rel="preload" 
      href="/fonts/CustomFont-Bold.woff2" 
      as="font" 
      type="font/woff2" 
      crossorigin>

<!-- CSS -->
<style>
  @font-face {
    font-family: 'CustomFont';
    src: url('/fonts/CustomFont.woff2') format('woff2'),
         url('/fonts/CustomFont.woff') format('woff');
    font-display: swap;
  }
</style>

Subsetting WOFF Fonts

Reduce file size by including only needed glyphs:

Using pyftsubset

# Latin characters only
pyftsubset MyFont.ttf \
  --unicodes="U+0020-007F,U+00A0-00FF" \
  --output-file=MyFont-Latin.woff \
  --flavor=woff

# Specific text content
pyftsubset MyFont.ttf \
  --text-file=content.txt \
  --output-file=MyFont-Subset.woff \
  --flavor=woff

# Keep OpenType features
pyftsubset MyFont.ttf \
  --unicodes="U+0020-007F" \
  --layout-features="*" \
  --output-file=MyFont-Features.woff \
  --flavor=woff

Converting WOFF to Other Formats

# WOFF to TTF (extract original font)
woff2sfnt MyFont.woff

# WOFF to WOFF2 (via TTF intermediate)
woff2sfnt MyFont.woff > MyFont-temp.ttf
woff2_compress MyFont-temp.ttf

# Using fonttools
ttx -f MyFont.woff  # Creates MyFont.ttx (XML)
ttx -f -o MyFont.ttf MyFont.ttx  # Convert back to TTF

For easy conversions without command-line tools, use our Font Converter Tool which supports batch processing and multiple output formats.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I still use WOFF in 2025?

Use WOFF only as a fallback alongside WOFF2. If you need to support Internet Explorer 11 or very old mobile browsers, include both formats in your @font-face declaration with WOFF2 first. For modern-browser-only projects, use WOFF2 exclusively—it has 97%+ browser support and offers 30% better compression.

What's the difference between WOFF and WOFF2?

Both wrap TrueType/OpenType fonts for web delivery, but they use different compression:

  • WOFF: Uses zlib compression, ~40% smaller than TTF/OTF
  • WOFF2: Uses Brotli compression with preprocessing, ~60% smaller than TTF/OTF (30% better than WOFF)
  • Browser support: WOFF works in IE9+; WOFF2 works in all modern browsers
  • Recommendation: Use WOFF2 as primary format, WOFF as legacy fallback

Can I use WOFF fonts on desktop applications?

No, WOFF is a web-only format. Operating systems and desktop applications cannot install or use WOFF fonts directly. For desktop use, convert WOFF back to TTF or OTF using tools like fonttools or woff2sfnt. However, the original TTF/OTF source font is preferable if available, as it hasn't been through the compression/decompression cycle.

Does WOFF support variable fonts?

Yes, WOFF can contain variable fonts. Since WOFF is just a container for TTF/OTF fonts, if the source font is a variable font with OpenType variation tables (fvar, gvar, etc.), those tables are preserved in the WOFF wrapper. Browsers that support variable fonts will utilize all interpolation axes when the font is loaded, just as they would with the original TTF/OTF variable font.

How do I convert TTF to WOFF?

Use command-line tools or online converters:

  • sfnt2woff: sfnt2woff MyFont.ttf
  • fonttools: pyftsubset MyFont.ttf --flavor=woff --output-file=MyFont.woff
  • Online: Use our Font Converter Tool for easy conversion

Note: Also create WOFF2 versions for optimal performance—they're 30% smaller than WOFF.

Why is my WOFF font not loading in the browser?

Common causes and solutions:

  • CORS issues: Ensure proper Access-Control-Allow-Origin headers if hosting fonts on a CDN
  • Wrong MIME type: Server should serve WOFF withfont/woff MIME type
  • Incorrect path: Verify the URL in src: points to the actual font file
  • Corrupted file: Re-convert from the original TTF/OTF source
  • Browser cache: Hard refresh (Ctrl+F5) to clear cached files

Check browser DevTools Network tab to see if the font file is actually being requested and what status code is returned.

Ready to Work with WOFF Fonts?

Convert any font format to WOFF with our free online converter

Related Resources

Related Font Formats

Sarah Mitchell

Written & Verified by

Sarah Mitchell

Product Designer, Font Specialist