Font Services Comparison: Google Fonts vs Adobe Fonts vs Fontshare vs Bunny Fonts
A complete guide to choosing the right font service for your project, covering licensing, GDPR privacy compliance, performance, and total cost across all major font providers
In Simple Terms
Google Fonts dominates with 47% of web pages using it and 1,900+ free families, but its CDN collects visitor IP addresses, raising GDPR concerns.For GDPR compliance, self-host fonts or use Bunny Fonts (privacy-focused Google Fonts alternative). Adobe Fonts requires Creative Cloud subscription but offers 30,000+ premium fonts.Fontshare offers free, high-quality fonts with full commercial rights. Font Squirrel provides a free webfont generator for self-hosting any compatible font.
In this article
The font service you choose affects far more than aesthetic preferences. It determines your legal compliance obligations, the privacy rights of your site visitors, your page load performance, and your total cost of ownership over time. With the GDPR enforcement actions against Google Fonts CDN use starting in 2022, and with Core Web Vitals now influencing search rankings, the stakes have never been higher for this decision.
This comparison covers the five major font services used in web development: Google Fonts, Adobe Fonts, Font Squirrel, Fontshare, and Bunny Fonts. Each serves a different market segment and comes with distinct trade-offs. A personal blog, a multinational corporation, and a design agency each have different needs, and the right service for one may be entirely wrong for another.
This guide examines each service across seven dimensions: library size and quality, licensing terms, GDPR and privacy compliance, CDN performance, self-hosting options, cost, and fit for specific use cases. By the end, you should have a clear framework for making an informed decision rather than defaulting to whatever is most familiar.
Overview of Major Font Services
Each font service has a distinct origin story, philosophy, and target audience. Understanding who built the service and why helps predict how it will evolve and where its priorities lie.
Google Fonts
Launched in 2010, Google Fonts is the world's largest free font directory and CDN. According to W3Techs data, it powers the typography on approximately 47% of all websites globally. The service began as a way to improve the web's typographic quality and reduce reliance on the small set of system fonts available across operating systems.
Key Characteristics:
- Library size: 1,900+ font families
- License: Open Font License (OFL) on nearly all fonts
- Cost: Free
- Delivery: Google-operated CDN
- API: CSS link tag integration
- Self-hosting: Permitted and straightforward
Best For:
- Projects where privacy is not a constraint
- Rapid prototyping and development
- Non-EU audiences or sites with consent banners
- Self-hosting after downloading fonts
- Any project requiring a broad, free library
Notable Fonts:
Roboto, Open Sans, Lato, Montserrat, Raleway, Noto Sans, Inter, Playfair Display, Merriweather, Source Code Pro
Adobe Fonts (formerly Typekit)
Adobe acquired Typekit in 2011 and rebranded it as Adobe Fonts in 2018, integrating it fully into Creative Cloud. The service offers the largest licensed font library of any subscription-based service, with fonts from foundries including Adobe Originals, Monotype, and hundreds of independent type designers. Adobe Fonts is the choice of professional designers who need premium typefaces unavailable elsewhere for free.
Key Characteristics:
- Library size: 30,000+ fonts
- License: Subscription-locked (fonts deactivate if subscription lapses)
- Cost: Bundled with Creative Cloud ($22.99-$54.99/mo)
- Delivery: Adobe-operated CDN
- Self-hosting: Not permitted under standard terms
- Desktop sync: Fonts sync to desktop apps automatically
Best For:
- Professional designers on Creative Cloud
- Projects requiring premium commercial typefaces
- Agencies with existing CC subscriptions
- Brand typography from major foundries
- Desktop and web use within one license
Notable Fonts:
Futura PT, Source Sans Pro, Proxima Nova, Neue Haas Grotesk, Minion Pro, Freight Display, Acumin, Myriad Pro
Font Squirrel
Font Squirrel occupies a unique position: it is both a curated font directory and a tool provider. Its Webfont Generator is the industry-standard free tool for converting desktop fonts into web-ready formats (WOFF2, WOFF, EOT) and generating corresponding CSS. The font directory focuses exclusively on commercially-usable free fonts, making it a reliable source when designers need to verify a font's license before embedding it on a client site.
Key Characteristics:
- Library size: Several thousand curated entries
- License: Varies per font (all commercially usable)
- Cost: Free
- Delivery: Self-host only (no CDN)
- Webfont Generator: Industry-standard conversion tool
- Curation focus: Strictly commercial-use-allowed fonts
Best For:
- Converting fonts to web formats
- Verifying commercial license compliance
- Self-hosted workflows
- Finding free alternatives to paid fonts
- Generating @font-face CSS automatically
Fontshare
Launched in 2021 by the Indian Type Foundry (ITF), Fontshare represents a new model: professional-quality fonts, free forever, with full commercial rights. ITF is a respected foundry whose retail fonts sell for hundreds of dollars per family. Fontshare exists to build the foundry's reputation and community goodwill while making high-quality typography accessible to independent designers and small studios who cannot afford commercial licenses.
Key Characteristics:
- Library size: 100+ curated, high-quality families
- License: Fontshare License (free, commercial, personal)
- Cost: Free
- Delivery: Fontshare CDN or self-hosted
- Quality: Foundry-grade, variable font support
- Origin: Indian Type Foundry (ITF)
Best For:
- Designers seeking quality over quantity
- Projects needing premium aesthetic without cost
- Startups and independent developers
- Alternative to generic Google Fonts
- Variable font projects
Bunny Fonts
Bunny Fonts, operated by BunnyWay d.o.o. (a Slovenian company), launched as a direct response to the 2022 German court rulings finding that Google Fonts CDN use violated GDPR. It is an API-compatible drop-in replacement for Google Fonts: you change one URL in your CSS and get the same fonts from a privacy-first CDN that does not log IP addresses. For EU-based projects that previously used Google Fonts CDN and want zero additional development work, Bunny Fonts is the simplest compliant solution.
Key Characteristics:
- Library size: 1,400+ families (mirrors Google Fonts)
- License: OFL (same as Google Fonts)
- Cost: Free
- Privacy: No IP logging, no tracking
- API: Drop-in replacement for Google Fonts URL
- GDPR: Fully compliant by design
Best For:
- EU-based websites with GDPR obligations
- Migrating from Google Fonts CDN quickly
- Projects where privacy is a non-negotiable
- Sites that already use Google Fonts selection
- Developers who want zero tracking dependencies
| Service | Library Size | Cost | CDN Available | Self-Host | Market Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google Fonts | 1,900+ | Free | Yes | Yes | 47% of all sites |
| Adobe Fonts | 30,000+ | CC subscription | Yes | No | ~4% of sites |
| Font Squirrel | Thousands | Free | No | Yes (only option) | Tool-focused |
| Fontshare | 100+ | Free | Yes | Yes | Growing |
| Bunny Fonts | 1,400+ | Free | Yes (privacy-first) | Yes | GDPR-focused niche |
Licensing Comparison
Font licensing is the area where the most consequential differences between services emerge. The wrong license choice can expose a business to legal liability or cause unexpected costs when a subscription lapses.
Google Fonts: Open Font License (OFL)
Nearly all Google Fonts are released under the SIL Open Font License 1.1, one of the most permissive font licenses available. The OFL allows use, study, modification, and redistribution of fonts with only one restriction: if you modify a font and distribute it, you cannot sell it under the original name alone.
- Commercial use: Permitted with no royalties or attribution required
- Embedding in products: Permitted (apps, ebooks, documents)
- Modification: Permitted (modified fonts must be released under OFL)
- Selling fonts: Not permitted as standalone products
- Perpetuity: License is permanent regardless of Google's service status
- Self-hosting: Fully permitted and encouraged
The OFL is effectively "free forever." Even if Google discontinued the Fonts service tomorrow, projects using these fonts could continue using them indefinitely because the license exists at the font file level, not the service level.
Adobe Fonts: Subscription-Locked License
Adobe Fonts operates on a fundamentally different model. You do not purchase font licenses; you rent access to them through a Creative Cloud subscription. This has significant operational implications that are often misunderstood until a subscription lapses.
- Commercial use: Permitted while subscription is active
- Subscription lapse: Fonts stop working on websites immediately. Pages will fall back to system fonts.
- Self-hosting: Generally not permitted (fonts must be served via Adobe's CDN)
- Desktop sync: Fonts sync to local apps (Photoshop, Illustrator) while subscribed
- Pageview limits: Plans have monthly pageview limits (typically 1M on standard CC plans)
- Long-term projects: Risk if project outlives subscription commitment
Critical Risk to Understand:
If you build a client website using Adobe Fonts and the client does not maintain a Creative Cloud subscription, their website's typography will break. This makes Adobe Fonts unsuitable for client work unless the client is committed to maintaining CC long-term, or you transfer the design to OFL fonts at project handoff.
Fontshare: Fontshare License (Free Commercial)
Fontshare's license is clear and permissive. Fonts are free for personal and commercial use with no pageview caps, no subscription, and no requirement to credit the foundry. The license is perpetual for downloaded font files, though Fontshare's CDN access depends on the service remaining operational.
- Personal use: Fully permitted
- Commercial use: Fully permitted
- Attribution: Not required
- Self-hosting: Permitted (download and self-host freely)
- Embedding: Permitted in apps, documents, products
- Redistribution: Check per-font terms (generally restricted)
Font Squirrel: Varies Per Font
Font Squirrel curates fonts where commercial web use is specifically allowed, but individual fonts carry their own licenses (OFL, Apache, custom commercial). The platform's value is that it pre-screens fonts for commercial suitability, saving time verifying license terms. Always read the specific license for each Font Squirrel font before use on commercial projects.
Bunny Fonts: OFL (Same as Google Fonts)
Bunny Fonts hosts the same fonts as Google Fonts under the same Open Font License. The licensing terms are identical. Bunny Fonts differs only in its CDN privacy policy, not the font licenses themselves. If a font is permitted under Google Fonts OFL, it is equally permitted when served from Bunny Fonts.
| Service | License Type | Commercial Use | Perpetual | Self-Host |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google Fonts | OFL 1.1 | Yes, always | Yes | Yes |
| Adobe Fonts | Subscription | While subscribed only | No | No |
| Font Squirrel | Varies (OFL, Apache, custom) | Yes (pre-screened) | Yes | Yes (required) |
| Fontshare | Fontshare License | Yes, always | Yes | Yes |
| Bunny Fonts | OFL 1.1 | Yes, always | Yes | Yes |
Privacy and GDPR Compliance
GDPR compliance became a concrete operational concern for font service selection in January 2022, when the Munich Regional Court (Landgericht Munchen I) ruled that a website operator violated GDPR by embedding Google Fonts via the Google CDN. The court found that transmitting visitor IP addresses to Google constitutes a transfer of personal data to the United States without adequate legal basis, awarding the plaintiff 100 euros in damages. Similar complaints have been filed across the EU since this ruling.
The Core Privacy Problem with Third-Party Font CDNs
When a visitor's browser loads a font from a third-party CDN (Google, Adobe, Fontshare), their browser automatically sends the following data to that CDN's servers:
- IP address: Identifies approximate location and potentially the individual
- Referrer URL: The page URL where the font was requested from
- Browser and OS information: User-Agent header
- Timestamp: When the request was made
Under GDPR, IP addresses are classified as personal data. Transferring them to third-party servers — especially servers outside the EU without an adequacy decision — requires either explicit user consent or a valid legal basis. The "legitimate interests" basis has been increasingly rejected by data protection authorities for this use case.
Google Fonts CDN: GDPR Risk
Using Google Fonts via the standard CDN link creates GDPR compliance risk for EU-based websites or websites with EU visitors. Google's own documentation acknowledges that font requests are logged. The 2022 Munich ruling established judicial precedent, though enforcement approaches vary by EU member state.
Solutions in order of GDPR risk reduction: (1) Self-host fonts downloaded from Google Fonts. (2) Switch to Bunny Fonts CDN. (3) Add a cookie consent mechanism that blocks font loading until consent is given.
Adobe Fonts CDN: Similar Risk Profile
Adobe Fonts operates via Adobe's CDN servers, which are also outside the EU in many cases. Since self-hosting is not permitted under Adobe Fonts terms, EU-compliance requires relying on Adobe's Data Processing Agreement (DPA) and Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs), which Adobe does provide. Whether this is sufficient depends on your legal counsel's interpretation and your DPA audience's risk tolerance. Adobe is a US company and subject to US surveillance laws, which remains a concern under Schrems II analysis.
Bunny Fonts: GDPR by Design
Bunny Fonts was specifically architected to eliminate the GDPR problem. BunnyWay is a European company (Slovenia, EU member state). Their CDN is configured to not log IP addresses at the application level. The company publishes a privacy policy explicitly stating no personal data is collected from font requests.
This makes Bunny Fonts the lowest-effort GDPR-compliant CDN option. Change the font URL from fonts.googleapis.com to fonts.bunny.net and font requests are no longer a GDPR concern.
Self-Hosting: Maximum Privacy Compliance
Self-hosting fonts on your own server eliminates third-party data transfers entirely. Font requests stay within your own infrastructure, subject only to your own privacy policy and data retention practices. This is the gold standard for GDPR compliance and also has performance benefits (same-origin requests, HTTP/2 multiplexing without cross-origin overhead).
Font Squirrel fonts must be self-hosted by design. Google Fonts and Fontshare explicitly permit self-hosting. Only Adobe Fonts restricts self-hosting under standard terms.
| Service | CDN Location | Logs IP? | GDPR Risk (CDN) | GDPR Compliant Path |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google Fonts | US/Global (Google) | Yes | High | Self-host or Bunny Fonts |
| Adobe Fonts | US/Global (Adobe) | Yes (DPA available) | Medium | Sign DPA with Adobe |
| Font Squirrel | N/A (self-host only) | N/A | None (self-host) | Inherently compliant |
| Fontshare | Global (ITF CDN) | Likely (check policy) | Medium | Self-host downloads |
| Bunny Fonts | EU (BunnyWay, Slovenia) | No (by design) | Low/None | Use CDN as-is |
Performance Metrics
Font loading performance directly affects Core Web Vitals scores, particularly Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) and Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS). Google's own performance guidelines cite render-blocking fonts as a common LCP bottleneck. Choosing how and where fonts are served matters measurably.
CDN Performance Factors
Third-party CDN font loading involves several network steps that add latency before a single byte of font data is transferred:
- DNS resolution: The browser must look up the CDN's IP address. If the DNS record is not cached, this adds 20-120ms on average. A preconnect hint (
<link rel="preconnect">) reduces this by warming the connection early. - TLS handshake: Establishing a secure connection to the CDN adds another 50-150ms round trip, depending on server location and the visitor's network.
- HTTP request: Fetching the font CSS file, which lists the actual font URLs. This is a second round trip before any font bytes download.
- Font file download: Finally, the actual WOFF2 files download. A subsetted Latin WOFF2 file is typically 15-50KB.
Google Fonts CDN: Global Edge but Cross-Origin Overhead
Google's CDN is one of the best-distributed in the world, with edge nodes in 200+ locations. For visitors far from your origin server, Google's CDN may actually be faster than self-hosting. However, cross-origin overhead still applies (DNS, TLS), and modern browsers no longer share the CDN cache across sites for privacy reasons (a Chrome 86+ change that eliminated the cross-site caching benefit Google Fonts previously had).
Recommended optimization for Google Fonts CDN:
<link rel="preconnect" href="https://fonts.googleapis.com"> <link rel="preconnect" href="https://fonts.gstatic.com" crossorigin>
These preconnect hints reduce the cross-origin latency by initiating DNS and TLS before the browser discovers the font link in CSS.
Self-Hosted Fonts: Same-Origin Advantage
Self-hosted fonts eliminate the cross-origin DNS and TLS overhead entirely. The font request goes to the same server (or CDN) as all other page assets, benefiting from already-established HTTP/2 connections. This typically saves 50-300ms of connection overhead per page load.
- HTTP/2 multiplexing: Font files download in parallel with other assets over the same connection, no queuing
- Cache control: You control
Cache-Controlheaders. Set long TTLs (1 year) with content-hash filenames for optimal repeat-visit performance. - Preload: Use
<link rel="preload" as="font">for critical fonts. This is more effective for same-origin fonts. - Trade-off: You pay your own bandwidth costs. For high-traffic sites, font serving bandwidth is measurable but usually not significant vs. image bandwidth.
| Delivery Method | DNS Overhead | HTTP/2 Multiplexing | Cache Control | Typical First Load |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google Fonts CDN | Cross-origin (mitigated with preconnect) | Separate connection | Google-controlled (1 year) | 300-600ms (with preconnect) |
| Adobe Fonts CDN | Cross-origin | Separate connection | Adobe-controlled | 400-800ms |
| Bunny Fonts CDN | Cross-origin (EU-focused edge) | Separate connection | Bunny-controlled | 250-500ms (EU visitors) |
| Self-Hosted | None (same origin) | Shared connection | Full control | 100-250ms |
Self-Hosting vs CDN Delivery
Self-hosting has become the recommended approach for most production websites, combining GDPR compliance with performance benefits. Understanding exactly what self-hosting involves and its trade-offs helps teams make an informed choice rather than defaulting to CDN out of convenience.
How to Self-Host Google Fonts
Google Fonts fonts are downloadable and can be self-hosted. The process involves three steps:
- 1. Download the font files. Visit fonts.google.com, select your fonts, and download the ZIP. Alternatively, use the google-webfonts-helper tool (gwfh.mranftl.com) which packages fonts in all required formats (WOFF2, WOFF) with generated @font-face CSS.
- 2. Place font files in your project. A typical location is
/public/fonts/for Next.js or/static/fonts/for other frameworks. Organize by font family if using multiple. - 3. Add @font-face declarations. Reference the local files instead of CDN URLs. Include WOFF2 as the primary format with WOFF as fallback for near-complete browser coverage.
Example @font-face declaration:
@font-face {
font-family: 'Inter';
font-style: normal;
font-weight: 400;
font-display: swap;
src: url('/fonts/inter-v13-latin-regular.woff2') format('woff2'),
url('/fonts/inter-v13-latin-regular.woff') format('woff');
}Benefits of Self-Hosting
Performance:
- No cross-origin DNS lookup
- No separate TLS handshake
- HTTP/2 multiplexing with other assets
- Full control over cache headers
- Preload hints are more effective
Compliance and Reliability:
- GDPR compliant by default
- No third-party service dependency
- Site works if CDN goes down
- No service terms to comply with
- No unexpected API changes
Trade-offs of Self-Hosting
- Manual updates: When a font designer releases a new version, you must manually download and update your font files. CDN services handle this automatically. For most production fonts on long-lived projects, this is rarely a concern.
- Bandwidth costs: Font files are served from your own hosting bandwidth. A 30KB WOFF2 file served to 100,000 visitors per month = ~3GB of bandwidth. With modern CDN pricing, this is negligible but not zero.
- Initial setup time: Setting up self-hosted fonts takes 15-30 minutes. Google Fonts CDN integration takes 2 minutes. For rapid prototyping, the CDN is faster to set up.
- Storage overhead: Font files live in your repository or deployment artifact. WOFF2 files are typically 15-80KB each, small compared to image assets.
For a detailed technical comparison of the self-hosting versus CDN decision across all factors, see the Self-Hosted vs CDN Fonts comparison.
Cost Analysis
Font service costs span from zero to hundreds of dollars per month depending on the service and usage scale. Understanding the full cost picture, including hidden costs like compliance work and subscription lock-in risk, is essential for project budgeting.
Direct Cost Comparison
| Service | Monthly Cost | Annual Cost | Pageview Limits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Google Fonts | Free | Free | None |
| Adobe Fonts (CC Single App) | $22.99 | $275.88 | 1M pageviews/mo |
| Adobe Fonts (CC All Apps) | $54.99 | $659.88 | 1M pageviews/mo |
| Font Squirrel | Free | Free | None (self-host) |
| Fontshare | Free | Free | None stated |
| Bunny Fonts | Free | Free | None |
Hidden and Indirect Costs
GDPR Compliance Work (Google Fonts CDN):
Using Google Fonts CDN on an EU-facing site requires either adding a consent mechanism (development cost: $500-$5,000 depending on approach), switching to self-hosting or Bunny Fonts (one-time developer time: 1-3 hours), or accepting legal risk. The Munich court awarded 100 euros per complaint. If you have significant EU traffic and receive complaints, the cost of litigation far exceeds switching to a compliant approach.
Adobe Fonts Subscription Lock-In:
If a project built with Adobe Fonts needs to outlast a CC subscription, the cost is either continued subscription payment or a redesign using freely licensed fonts. For an agency building sites for clients, this creates a structural dependency: the client must maintain CC, or you must redesign typography at handoff. Budget for one of these when choosing Adobe Fonts for client work.
When Premium Fonts Justify the Cost:
Adobe Fonts and paid font licenses are worth the cost for brands where typography is a competitive differentiator. A distinctive, exclusive typeface is part of brand identity that free alternatives cannot replicate. For enterprise brands, a $600/year CC subscription for access to premium typefaces like Neue Haas Grotesk or Freight Display is trivial compared to the brand value. The question is not cost but whether uniqueness and quality are a business requirement.
Choosing the Right Service
The right font service depends on your specific project constraints. No single service is best for every situation. Use the frameworks below to match your requirements to the appropriate service.
Decision Framework by Use Case
Personal Blog or Portfolio (Non-commercial, Any Geography):
Recommended: Google Fonts CDN or Bunny Fonts CDN. Either is appropriate. Google Fonts has more variety; Bunny Fonts is the privacy-respecting choice. GDPR risk is lower for personal sites without commercial intent, but Bunny Fonts adds zero overhead if switching from Google.
Corporate Website (EU Audience):
Recommended: Self-hosted fonts (OFL sources) or Bunny Fonts CDN. GDPR compliance is non-negotiable for commercial entities with EU visitors. Self-hosting OFL fonts from Google Fonts downloads is the most robust approach. Bunny Fonts CDN is acceptable if you want CDN convenience without GDPR risk. Avoid Google Fonts CDN without a consent mechanism.
Design Agency (Client Work):
Recommended: Adobe Fonts for internal use; self-hosted OFL fonts for client handoffs. Adobe Fonts works well within agency workflows where Creative Cloud is already in use. For client projects, use OFL-licensed fonts (Google Fonts, Fontshare) and self-host, so the client can maintain the site without a CC dependency. Document the typography setup clearly in handoff documentation.
EU-Based Business (Strict GDPR Compliance Required):
Recommended: Self-hosting or Bunny Fonts. For businesses in highly regulated sectors (healthcare, finance, legal) or those that have received DPA inquiries, self-hosting is the clearest compliance path. Bunny Fonts is a solid alternative if the self-hosting setup overhead is a concern. Have legal counsel review your font data processing approach as part of your DPIA.
Budget-Conscious Independent Developer:
Recommended: Google Fonts (self-hosted) or Fontshare. Both offer high-quality, commercially free fonts at zero cost. Self-hosting Google Fonts provides the largest selection. Fontshare offers premium foundry-quality fonts that look distinctly better than generic Google Fonts choices and differentiate projects from the crowd.
Enterprise Brand Project:
Recommended: Adobe Fonts or direct type foundry license. Enterprise branding requires typefaces that cannot be found on every other website. Adobe Fonts' 30,000+ library includes foundry exclusives. For true brand exclusivity, a direct license from a type foundry (Hoefler, Klim, Commercial Type) may be the right investment, providing self-hosting rights and long-term certainty.
Recommendation Matrix
| Priority | Google Fonts | Adobe Fonts | Font Squirrel | Fontshare | Bunny Fonts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zero cost | Excellent | Poor | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent |
| GDPR compliance | Poor (CDN) | Medium | Excellent | Medium (CDN) | Excellent |
| Library variety | Excellent | Excellent | Good | Limited | Good |
| Font quality | Variable | Excellent | Variable | Excellent | Variable |
| Self-hosting | Yes | No | Yes (required) | Yes | Yes |
| Perpetual license | Yes (OFL) | No | Yes | Yes | Yes (OFL) |
| Ease of setup | Excellent | Excellent | Moderate | Good | Excellent |
Summary Recommendation
- For most new projects in 2026: Self-host OFL fonts sourced from Google Fonts or Fontshare. This provides GDPR compliance, better performance, perpetual licensing, and zero ongoing cost. The one-time setup is 15-30 minutes.
- For quick setup with GDPR compliance: Use Bunny Fonts CDN. Drop-in replacement for Google Fonts CDN with a single URL change and no privacy concerns.
- For premium typography in professional design workflows: Adobe Fonts is hard to beat for its library depth, but understand and plan for the subscription dependency before recommending it to clients.
- For converting any font to web format: Font Squirrel's Webfont Generator remains the standard tool, regardless of which font service you source from.
In this article
Developer & Verifier
Developed by
Marcus Rodriguez
Lead Developer
Verified by
Sarah Mitchell
Product Designer, Font Specialist
GOOGLE-FONTS vs ADOBE-FONTS FAQs
Common questions answered about this font format comparison